Home > US & ICC Info > Administration Update > Administration Policy > Iraqi War Crimes
US & ICC Info
 

Administration Update
Response to ICC Legislation
Administration Advocacy
Clinton Archive
 

Congressional Update
 

Media Coverage
 

US Law
 

Papers on US Position
 

US Advocacy
 

Public Opinion
 

International Reaction
 

 

 
 

 

 

 
Iraqi War Crimes
   

 PRINT THIS DOCUMENT

WAR CRIMES TRIALS IN IRAQ

Iraqi Special Tribunal and the ICC

The Statute of the Iraqi Special Tribunal, available online on the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA)'s website, was approved by the Iraqi Governing Council and signed into law by Ambassador Bremer on behalf of the CPA in December 2003. The substantive provisions were lifted almost word for word from the ICC's Rome Statute. Important differences include limiting the Court's jurisdiction to Iraqis and to crimes committed before May 2003, extending the Tribunal's jurisdiction to some crimes under Iraqi law, providing for the death penalty, and reducing substantially the protection of defendant's rights.

The Statute was drafted by Professor Cherif Bassiouni, President of DePaul University Law School's International Human Rights Law Institute (an AMICC member) and a leading authority in the field of international criminal law. He has been an advocate of the ICC for many years and was chairman of the drafting committee at the Rome Conference on the ICC in 1998.

The draft was then vetted by lawyers in the CPA legal office, including British and Australians, as well as Americans. We understand that the text was approved in English and that no Arabic translation yet exists.

This development inevitably raises questions about why the Rome Statute was relied upon so heavily, and what this means for US policy toward the ICC. Clearly, it demonstrates that the Bush administration has no serious objections to the jurisprudence of the Court and considers it to be a reliable restatement of the current status of international law. Its primary objection to the ICC is its jurisdiction — its ability to try Americans without explicit US consent. Because the Iraqi Special Tribunal does not rely on universal jurisdiction, and in fact can not reach non-Iraqis or Iraqi residents, no American could ever be tried by it. Because of this major restriction on the Special Court's power, the approval of the statute by the CPA does not reflect any softening of the US ICC position.

Government Information

US Department of State website, Iraq Update
Senate Governmental Affairs Committee Hearing: "Prosecuting Iraqi War Crimes; A Consideration of the Different Forum Options," April 10, 2003
Senate Resolution HR 101 (108th Cong.), April 10, 2003, calling for the prosecution of Iraqis and their supporters for war crimes, and for other purposes.
US Army Identified 500 Alleged Iraqi War Criminals in 1992, Report Released under FOIA is a Precursor to 2003 War Crimes Proceedings, The National Security Archive at George Washington University, March 20, 2003
House of Representatives Resolution HR 118 (108th Cong.), February 27, 2003, calling for the establishment of an international criminal tribunal for the purpose of indicting, prosecuting, and imprisoning Saddam Hussein and other Iraqi officials who are responsible for crimes against humanity, genocide, and other criminal violations of international law.
UK Parliament Debate, February 25, 2003, discussing how exile for Saddam Hussein wold be impacted by the existence of the ICC
Richard Boucher, Spokesman, Department of State Daily Press Briefing, January 17, 2003, discussing the possiblity of trials for top Iraqi officials
Ari Fleischer, White House Spokesperson, Press Briefing, October 11, 2002, re US plans for addressing war crimes in Iraq
Saddam Hussein As a War Criminal, remarks by Ambassador Scheffer, Ambassador-at-large for War Crimes in the Clinton Administration to Congressional Human Rights Caucus, entered into the Congressional Record September 22, 2000

For more remarks by David Scheffer, President Clinton's Ambassador-at-large for War Crimes, in reference to war crimes in Iraq, click here.

Press Coverage

Trying Saddam, Douglas Cassel, Broadcast on World View with Jerome McDonnell, WBEZ Chicago Public Radio, December 17, 2003
Iraq Council Creating War-Crimes Tribunal, Associated Press, October 1, 2003
US Intelligence Categorizes Iraqis to Punish, or to Deal With, by Thom Shanker and David Johnston, New York Times, February 25, 2003
"Wartime Justice: Legal Experts Ponder a Trial for Saddam Hussein," James Podgers, ABA Journal eReport, February 21, 2003
Q&A with Phil Shiner, Michael Scharf, Jim Clancy, and Zain Verjee, CNN Int'l, February 18, 2003, discussing the possiblity of an ICC trial for UK P.M. Tony Blair if the US and UK go to war against Iraq.
"Bush Is Backing Exile for Hussein," by Sonni Efron, LA Times, January 31, 2003
"US Would Welcome Exile for Saddam: Bush", Agence France Presse, January 30, 2003
"Trying Saddam: The Options," by Anthony Dworkin, Crimes of War Project, November 18, 2002
"US Would Seek to Try Hussein for War Crimes," by Peter Slevin, Washington Post, October, 29, 2002
"Try Him for His Crimes," by David Scheffer, Former Ambassador-at-Large for War Crimes, Washington Post, September 12, 2002
"Indict Saddam," by Kenneth Roth, Wall Street Journal, March 22, 2002
"US Senate Calls for War Crimes Trial for Saddam Hussein," CNN interactive, March 13, 1998

Background on Crimes

WICC Q&A Factsheet, "Could the ICC Try Saddam Hussein?"
Situation of Human Rights in Iraq, UN Commission on Human Rights Resolution 2002/15, April 19, 2002

For more information about Iraqi war crimes go to the INDICT website.

CLICK HERE to download a flyer on Iraq and the ICC for distribution at events or rallies.

Return to Administration ICC Policy Table of Contents

       
   



Home | What is the AMICC | What is the ICC | US & ICC Info | Advocacy Center | Calendar of Events
Local ICC Contacts | Site Map | Contact Us

© 2002 AMICC All Rights Reserved. A Program of the United Nations Association of the United States of America.